Institution Watch
Local Governments
Some RP provinces too poor to prepare for disasters
Article Index Institution Watch Local Governments |
| Some RP provinces too poor to prepare for disasters |
|
|
| Written by Jesus F. Llanto | |
| Tuesday, 08 July 2008 | |
|
Eight of the country’s poorest provinces are exposed to multiple natural hazards, but they, like most localities in the Philippines, lack the capability to prepare for disasters. Vinod Thomas, director-general of the World Bank’s Independent Evaluation Group, today said that lack of resources is a major constraint to the ability of local government units (LGUs) to perform its role in minimizing the damages of disasters to lives, properties, and the economy. Outdated policy frameworks, and the mismatch between planning and budgeting, also prevent LGUs, even the national government, from having responsive and effective disaster risk management (DRM) plans, Thomas said at a seminar on natural disasters and environmental protection held Monday in Pasig City. He identified the eight of the poorest provinces that are hazard-prone: Tawi-tawi, Zamboanga del Norte, Maguindanao, Surigao del Norte, Lanao del Sur, Northern Samar, Masbate, and Misamis Occidental. Most vulnerableThe poor, Thomas said, are the hardest hit by disasters. Citing the World Development Report 2003, he said that people in low-income countries are four times as likely as people in high-income countries to die in a natural disaster. “Poor people and poor communities are frequently primary victims…[because] they live in crowded makeshift houses. Injury, disability, and loss of life directly affect their main asset, their labor” he said. Father Francis Lucas, chair of the Asian NGO Coalition, said vulnerability is related to poverty. “They (the poor) become helpless, hopeless, and hapless.” LGUs are often saddled with institutional and financial constraints that local disaster coordinating councils are not created anymore or do not have the capacities to assume their functions, Thomas said. “Calamity fund [both at the national and regional level] is deemed insufficient to address all phases of disaster risk management. Vast body of knowledge, skills, and tools on DRMs has not systematically trickled down to LGUs,” he said. Marion Andres, vice mayor of Marikina City, meanwhile, said most barangays have low financial resources, few trained medical staff, and lack equipment. “There should be good working relationship with senators and congressmen to purchase needed equipment and communication facilities.” Increasing risksIn June, Typhoon Fengshen lashed Visayas and Luzon and caused flooding, particularly in Western Visayas. Thomas said there are increasing risks now in the Philippines. “[Although] the number of typhoons remains the same, the intensity is increasing. Damage is greater because forest areas are shrinking.” Increase in urban population, poverty and the geographic locations of Philippine cities, he said, will also contribute to the higher risks posed by disasters. “Ten of Philippine key cities, including Manila, are located along coastlines, making them prone to inundation brought by the rise in sea level.” Thomas added that the concentration of population in urban areas also increase the risk. Urban population stands at 52 percent and is expected to reach 60 percent by 2010. “With the rising poverty, it is estimated that at least 40 percent of the urban population live in unsafe informal settlements.” Community actionLucas said that there is a need for community-based participation in DRM. “We cannot just depend on local government units, especially in rural areas.” “The first few days during a disaster, the community more often than not is left to fend for itself. Many months after a disaster, again it is the community left behind to pick up the broken pieces for creating a new beginning in a long term recovery,” he added. Sevillano David, chief of the planning division of the Mines and Geosciences Bureau, said that working with the community is important since national government agencies suffer from lack of manpower in responding to disasters. Thomas said there is need to update the government’s disaster management policies, which focus on disaster response rather than disaster risk management (DRM). DRM refers to the process of implementing policies and strategies that will help lessen the impacts of disasters. “Immediate reconstruction gets attention but prevention is missing,” Thomas told abs-cbnNews.com/Newsbreak. “The policies are very reactive and inadequately proactive.” New emerging challenges such as climate change, Thomas said, should also be considered in making the policies. He added that the lack of linkage between planning and budgeting for reconstruction and rehabilitation has become a stumbling block in disaster risk management. Cost of disasterThomas said the Philippines should improve its DRM because calamities have reduced the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) by as much as P19.7 billion a year for the past two decades. The amount represents around 0.5 percent of the GDP per year. A 2006 study by the IEG, “Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development,” estimates that 85.2 percent of the Philippines’ GDP is at risk due to disasters. The study ranked the Philippines 10th in terms of vulnerability based on economic risks from two or more disasters. Vietnam and Bangladesh ranked 5th and 9th, respectively while Thailand ranked 13th. Indonesia ranked 28th while China landed on the 29th spot. The Philippines lies in the Pacific Ring of Fire, where volcanic activities and earthquakes are common. It is also along the path of tropical storms that are formed in the Pacific Ocean. An average of 20 typhoons crosses the Philippines annually, with most of them bringing heavy rains that trigger landslides and massive floods. Thomas said there is need for a change of mindset. He said natural disasters are more predictable than once believed. “Disasters frequently recur in the same countries and risks may be anticipated.” He added that people should also learn to treat disaster as a risk rather than a hindrance to development. “The destructive impacts of disasters are linked closely with development, but disasters are typically treated as an interruption in government rather than as a risk to development.” (abs-cbnNEWS.com/Newsbreak)
RELATED STORIES: |
|
| Last Updated ( Sunday, 27 September 2009 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Get to access our archives and premium content. Subscribe to Newsbreak Online for only US$15 a year. How do I Subscribe?